THE STRUCTURE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES

0
579
You can download this material now from our portal

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Topic Statement

2.0 Criminal Justice System in the United States

2.1 History of the Criminal Justice System

2.1.1 Key features in the Bill of Rights

2.2 Structure of the Criminal Justice system

2.2.1 Law Enforcement (Police)

2.2.2 Courts

2.2.3 Correctional Systems:

2.3 Efficacy of the Criminal Justice System in recent times

3.0 Conclusion

References

 

1.0 Introduction

Maintenance of law and order forms an intrinsic part of the governance of every country. Proper law measures not only ensure the maintenance of a peaceful environment but also help to protect the interests of the people, regardless of their race, color, religion, and sex. In the context of the United States, its criminal justice system acts as an effective instrument of the government to ensure that law and order are maintained. The primary objectives of the criminal justice system in the United States entail effective law enforcement, preventing the prevalence of crimes, engaging in the rehabilitation of offenders, and ensuring that the citizens have a safe society to live in. This essay aims to elucidate in detail the structure of the criminal justice system in the United States of America but before doing that offers a brief history that led to its foundation and subsequently also comprehensively highlights the efficacy of the criminal justice system in recent times.

1.1 Topic Statement

To discuss the structure of the Criminal Justice System of the United States and highlight its efficacy in recent times

2.0 Criminal Justice System in the United States

The criminal justice system in the United States is an integration of government agencies and institutions that play a role in enforcing the legal code. Mayeux (2018) in her article defines the criminal justice system in the US as a unitary, integrated set of component institutions and processes that interact with one another using several interrelated structures, intending to perform a collective set of functions in the society and therefore subsequently could be studied, mapped, manipulated and tried to improve in systemic ways. The United States of America has three branches or pillars in its criminal justice system that entails the law enforcement (policeforce), the courts, and the correctional systems.

2.1 History of the Criminal Justice System

Starting from the inception of America as a nation till modern times, the criminal justice system in the country that encompasses the police, courts, and correctional systems has evolved slowly and gradually both at the state and the federal levels. It has been evidenced that before the American Revolution there was no distinct legal system in America and that the criminal codes, courts, and procedures of punishments varied from colony to colony. It was only during the revolution that the reformers felt the need to establish a much more comprehensive and unified judicial system. Therefore, the foundation of a new constitution after the revolution gave the founding fathers an apt opportunity to make a judicial framework that would enable them to not only maintain uniformity in the legal code but also ensure that the hard-earned liberties are not compromised at the hands of the state and federal governments.

With the U.S constitution conferring the federal government with specific powers, the state governments became apprehensive of the same and wanted specific protections and liberties in the criminal justice process. To ensure that the American constitution is finally adopted, a series of amendments were proposed to safeguard the citizens, and therefore in alignment with this, the Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791. The Bill of Rights was a document comprising ten amendments. Kozlovets & Lukyanchikova (2020) opine that to date the Bill of Rights 1791 continues to play a role in maintaining the democratic fabric of the United States and offers protection to the rights of the US citizens.

 2.1.1 Key features in the Bill of Rights:

The Eighth Amendment of the Bill of Rights aimed to protect citizens from unfair and cruel punishments. In addition, slowly incarceration began to be the chosen method of punishing the offenders as opposed to the former brutal and physically oppressive measures. There was a gradual growth and evolution witnessed in the prison systems that developed during the beginning of the nineteenth century; one such form of imprisonment included total isolation. In this context, a finding by Sakoda & Simes (2019) highlights how the method of solitary confinement is a harsh form of custody with restricted access to visitation and programs and that reports suggest that in recent times long-term isolation has shown a substantial positive correlation with Black young adults in the United States. However, police or the law enforcement that forms one of the pillars of the criminal justice system in the US began to evolve rather slowly during the nineteenth century and despite several attempts to improve it, it has been evidenced that it continued to be influenced by the political fabric of the United States.

2.2 Structure of the Criminal Justice system

As previously mentioned, the criminal justice system in the United States comprises three pillars or stages, namely the law enforcement (police), the courts, and the correctional systems.

2.2.1 Law Enforcement (Police):

The police form the first stage or pillar of the criminal justice system in the United States. The police in the United States are in charge of enforcing the law and public order at all three levels that encompass the federal, state, and county levels. In this regard what needs to be mentioned is the fact that no unified national police force exists in the United States, however, there are federal law enforcement officers. The government agencies under which these federal officers operate include the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The federal officers are entitled to deal with only those matters that fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government and therefore it has been observed that their field of expertise is usually narrow. An interesting fact in this regard has been stated by Yu (2018) who argues that women are grossly underrepresented in the US federal law agencies and that more proactive methods should be undertaken to engage more women in the law enforcement system.

The major functions of law enforcement include conducting arrests of suspected offenders, engaging in activities to gather and preserve evidence, establishing the motive behind a particular crime, and finally presenting arrest reports to higher authorities after conducting a comprehensive assessment. However, despite the basic functioning remaining the same, the specialized job profiles of the police officers at various levels involve carrying out different activities. For instance, while a county police officer may be engaged in carrying out day-to-day emergency activities, conducting patrols, and supervising the functioning of local jails, an officer of the DHS on the contrary would be more likely involved in dealing with cases about human trafficking or an officer of the FBI would be involved in investigating suspects in firearms trafficking, terrorism or security of government officials. The State police in the United States have the jurisdiction and authority to enforce statewide laws, while the county police can exhibit their authority restricted to only the town or county they serve.

2.2.2 Courts:

The second stage or pillar of the criminal justice system in the United States includes the courts. The courts are responsible for carrying out the adjudication process which in facile terms refers to the legal process by which a judgment is pronounced to the guilty in the court of law. The courts in the United States are organized at the federal, state, and special jurisdiction levels. As the name suggests, the federal courts including the Supreme Court of the United States (occupying the apex position in the hierarchy) deal with federal matters; these chiefly involve trade disputes, lawsuits against the government, and issues about the US military. An article by Siegel (2017) highlights the reciprocal relationship between the apex court in the United States and the other federal courts during certain circumstances and elucidates that in matters involving political conflicts, the apex court would interact with the other federal courts to increase public legitimacy and trust. The judges who preside over the federal courts are selected by the honorable President of the United States after receiving the consent of the US Congress.

The state courts, unlike the federal courts, vary greatly in their structure and include three levels such as trial courts, appellate courts, and state supreme courts. The two types of trial courts are traffic courts and small claims courts. It has been evidenced that criminal cases are heard by trial courts with general jurisdictions and in these cases, a judge and jury are both present. The jury is kept in charge of determining the authenticity of the crime committed and by that the penalty is determined by the judge. The procedure of adjudication involves three steps:

Pretrial stage: This is the first step wherein the law enforcement body submits the arrest report to the prosecutor who then decides whether or not the case qualifies as a criminal case. Sometimes the lack of substantial evidence may result in the prosecutor dropping the case altogether, though it is very unlikely.

Arraignment: This is the second step wherein the prosecutor decides to press charges against the accused and it is during this process the accused is made aware of the charges pressed against him/her.

Trial: This is the final step of the adjudication process that follows the arraignment. The trial aims to determine the guilt of the accused and if proven he is convicted.

2.2.3 Correctional Systems:

The final pillar or stage of the criminal justice system in the United States is the correctional system. The correctional system is also known as the prison system and primarily involves activities about the supervision of the individuals who have been convicted in the trial. In the context of the United States criminal justice system, it has been evidenced that the federal and state justice frameworks consider corrections to be the replacement for penology owing to the harshness and brutality of the latter. In the US context, the concept of a prison largely differs from that of a jail. While jails are for temporary confinement, usually aimed at individuals waiting for a trial or parole, prisons are for those convicts who are supposed to serve a longer sentence, preferably over a year.

The correctional homes or units are mainly in-charge of not only incarcerated convicts but also of those who do not need imprisonment but are in dire need of some regulatory supervision.  A recent finding by Prison Policy Initiative (2018) highlights how the incarceration rate is the highest in the United States and that it has the second highest prison population in the entire world. The initiative further mentions how more than 2.7 million children in the United States have a history of at least one incarcerated parent in addition to having over a million incarcerated women serving terms in the US owing to the challenges posed by drug abuse.

2.3 Efficacy of the Criminal Justice System in recent times

The criminal justice system of the United States has been embroiled in several controversies in recent times and that has gone on to expose structural loopholes and drawbacks all the more glaringly. The recent cases of police brutality in the United States on men of color have made people not just in America but globally question the legitimacy of the law enforcement department. In this context, Jean (2020) states how being killed by the police accounts for one of the leading causes of death for Blacks in America. In addition to this, a finding by Graham et al. (2020) also highlights how men of color worry five times more than Whites in America about police brutality, reflective of the emotional and psychological trauma that minorities and men of color continue to experience in America, even today.

3.0 Conclusion

This essay holistically describes the basic structural foundation of the criminal justice system in the United States succinctly highlighting some of the recent issues and trends that have been reported within the context of the judicial system in the US. By doing so, this essay aims to offer a deeper insight into a better understanding of the law system and cater to a wide section of the audience, who wants to know more on this subject.

 

The Structure of the Criminal Justice System in the United States

10

References

Graham, A., Haner, M., Sloan, M. M., Cullen, F. T., Kulig, T. C., & Jonson, C. L. (2020). Race

and Worrying About Police Brutality: The Hidden Injuries of Minority Status in

America. Victims & Offenders, 1-25.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1767252

The initiative, P. P. (2018). States of incarceration: the global context. Last accessed May, 15.

Jean, T. (2020). Black lives matter: Police brutality in the era of COVID-19. NC Med J.

Kozlovets, D. V., & Lukyanchikova, P. R. (2020). THE BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 OF THE USA AND ITS ROLE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DEMOCRATIC STATE. In

European Scientific Conference (pp. 143-144).

Mayeux, S. (2018). The idea of the criminal justice system. Am. J. Crim. L., 45, 55.

Sakoda, R. T., & Simes, J. T. (2019). Solitary confinement and the US Prison Boom. Criminal

Justice Policy Review, 0887403419895315. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419895315

Siegel, N. S. (2017). Reciprocal Legitimation in the Federal Courts System. Vand. L. Rev., 70,

1183.

Yu, H. H. (2018). Gender and public agency hiring: An exploratory analysis of recruitment practices in federal law enforcement. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 247-264.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018767473

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES

 

 

Leave a Reply