SOCIAL MEDIA AS A TOOL FOR PROPAGATING FAKE NEWS

0
232
You can download this material now from our portal

SOCIAL MEDIA AS A TOOL FOR PROPAGATING FAKE NEWS

ABSTRACT

Social media is used for falsehood and all sorts in other to discredit or cause tension, agitations, rancour, resentment, bitterness or umbrage along the divides of any society. It cuts across a great number of people, dealing with all human endeavour. Due to its nature, it becomes possible for it to be used as a tool for political propaganda. Fake news is highly problematic. Fake news, which are often prompted by one or more high-profile incident(s) involving extreme forms, tend to overlook the variation behind the term. This study sort out to highlight why and how political actors just as publicists pick the social media platforms as a means for spreading fake news. The study examined users of certain social networking sites such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram etc. and why they spread fake news without verifying. The survey research design was employed using the Taro Yamane’s formula with the simple random sampling technique. 400 respondents were sampled out of which 380 were returned successfully. The findings of the study revealed that social media is dynamic and because of its spontaneity, many people see it as an avenue to spread ills or violence, verbal attacks and discredit smooth running of the government. Carefully vetting one’s sources, and not allowing the social identity ideology to rope you in will help in curb fake news on social media.

Introduction

1.1       Background to the Study

At first, when the term ‘Fake news’ came into spotlight, individuals normally saw it as internet based life posts with rather mind blowing story. Actually, fake news via web-based networking media isn’t only a post that been enjoyed, mutual or followed, rather it is an incredible procedure of duplicating digital promulgation with its predominant impact on a huge region of web based life base clients (Alan, 2017. p.1). The term ‘Fake news’ is simply be of late inception, at the same time, the medium utilized, for example online networking, is the main new medium to spread it. The act of spreading promulgation has been around for a few centuries. In any case, web-based social networking as the branch of web is the most up to date methods for correspondence to be mishandled to spread falsehoods and deception in various fronts, for example, military, political, business, social, instruction, strict confidence, and so on. Truly, making and flowing ‘fake news’ via web-based networking media is developing as considerable industry, leaving stunning consequences for an enormous number of open in various pieces of the world.

1

Easy access to the web and capacity to interface effectively to web based life stages has made an expansion of news and data to anxious and accidental crowds and markets the same around the globe, with critical ramifications on clients’ utilization examples and perspectives toward the points shared (Ngwainmbi, 2018). Regardless internet based life has become a significant driver on deciding political results, remembering for politically delicate countries, developing networks, and industrialized areas. As of late, online life stages have become the new vox populi driving endlessly domineering systems and cultivating deception, fake news and related types of free discourse. Additionally, during the 2016 US Presidential Elections, fake news stories distributed via web-based networking media and generally disseminated by predominant press about the applicants’ public activity introduces internet based life as a basic wellspring of news. The equivalent isn’t fantastical as it happened in like manner during the 2019 presidential political race, as issues of optional school declarations were raised without legitimate confirmation or proof to back such case. That style of correspondence recommends the majority rule process itself is under danger. Through an across the nation overview, Alcott and Gentzkow (2017) have discovered that of the bogus reports showing up in online stages three months before the political decision, those preferring then Presidential Candidate Trump have shared an aggregate of 30 million times on Facebook, while those supporting his rival Hilary Clinton were shared multiple times. That type of informing recommends the law based procedure itself might be under new danger.

2

On the other hand, in open social orders, bogus news announcing is genuinely necessary diversion. Subsequent to having an unpleasant day at work or with different demanding errands, individuals need something to enable them to loosen up. Normally, nonetheless, it is expected that people with lower (versus more significant) levels of intellectual capacity are less prepared to conform to existing plans and starting decisions when stood up to with new, increasingly dependable data. Data that is later demonstrated to be inaccurate affects social impressions for those people with lower (versus more elevated) levels of intellectual capacity (De Keersmaecker and Roets, 2017, p. 107). It is all the more testing to address fake news since it is mass created and spreads quickly inside a brief timeframe, and individuals don’t set aside some effort to confirm its substance. Most readers don’t think that it’s important to crosscheck the whole source or survey the posted suppositions after they discover that such data was incorrect, which prompts the plenitude of fake news via web-based networking media stages. The bogus news gives the reader a feeling of separation from regular reality or normal, an avoiding of obligations, and an absence of worry for the qualities for the most part connected with jumping on’ on the planet (Collier, 2013). As a social develop, fake news profoundly affects relational and third individual connections and suggestions for fake media proficiency. Fake news has the components of fiction and misleading. Distributions with a mysterious creator; extreme outcry focuses, capital letters, and incorrect spellings; inscriptions that start with “This isn’t a fabrication!”; “Breaking News,” “Shared as got,” or “sent as got” are among the disturbing signs the substance could be fake. Additionally, news distributed on dot.com locales without a URL and publication staff and their contacts probably won’t be trusted. Regularly, readers and watchers loan themselves to mental delicacy.

3

News makers use dramatist, untrustworthy, or created features to expand readership, sharing, and produce income. Country building’ alludes to the way toward assembling a socially strong and mass-interceded procedure to shape and offer information and bring positive unmistakable change inside that characterized space. Here, the term building’ regularly connected with progression—positive change—ought not be understood as the standard. Or maybe, we contend that the thought of working’ as a type of progress’ may inevitably take a positive and profitable or negative and dangerous turn dependent on the qualities and convictions of the greater part. ”Fake news” has become a much-utilized and much-advertised term in the supposed ”post-truth” time that we presently live in. It is additionally much-defamed: it is frequently accused for disruptively affecting the results of decisions and referenda and for slanting majority rule open discussion, with the 2016 US Presidential races and Brexit choice regularly refered to as models. ”Fake news” has additionally been hailed for fuelling publicity and ”detest discourse” and even brutality. ”Pizzagate” is a notorious case of outstanding conditions wherein a bogus report had a focal job in a shooting episode (Alan, 2017. p.2). In December 2016, a man in Washington D.C. willingly volunteered to ”self-examine” a story (a totally unwarranted fear inspired notion) that the Hillary Clinton crusade group was running a paedophile ring from the premises of a pizza shop. Shots were discharged and he was captured and accused of ambush and related offenses.

The purveyors of disinformation go after the powerlessness or fanatic capability of beneficiaries whom they plan to enrol as intensifiers and multipliers. Along these lines, they try to invigorate us into turning out to be conductors of their messages by abusing our penchants to share data for an assortment of reasons. A specific threat is that ‘fake news’ in this sense is typically free – implying that individuals who can’t bear to pay for quality news coverage, or who need access to autonomous open help news media, are particularly powerless against both disinformation and falsehood.

4

The spread of disinformation and deception is made conceivable to a great extent through informal communities and social informing, which makes one wonder of the degree of guideline and self-guideline of organizations offering these types of assistance. In their character as go-between stages, instead of substance makers, these organizations need to date commonly been dependent upon just light-contact guideline (with the exception of in the region of copyright). With regards to developing weights on them, notwithstanding, just as the dangers to free articulation presented by over-guideline, there are expanded – albeit sketchy – steps in the casing of self-guideline (Haffajee, 2017). In 2018, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion concentrated his yearly report on the issue, encouraging the Internet organizations to gain from self-guideline in the news media, and to all the more likely line up with UN norms on the option to confer, look for and get data (OSCE, 2016). Inside this quick developing environment of measures taken by the two states and organizations, there is an exceptionally critical job for writers and news media, which is the place this distribution comes in.

1.2       Statement of the problem

Fake news has been flourishing with the web since the down of the 21st century. Lawmakers and people and associations have consistently utilized it as an instrument to beat naïve rivals and purchasers during their publicizing or political crusades to pick up prevalence and slant. Up to this point the 2016 general races in the US, nobody truly focused on it as they do now until President Donald Trump caused a lot to notice it impacting CNN for spreading fake news to support Hillary Clinton by means of his tweets.

In Nigeria, the web based life, is utilized both by the legislature in force and her adversaries to dishonour the mental stability of the nation’s vote based system. This isn’t fantastical for the situation concerning the director of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu who was allegedly charged for N36 billion misrepresentations and a blogger said the Vice President is involved with it to which he (the Vice President) answered with a suit for criticism of character and individual. It is against this scenery that this investigation tries to discover the why and how political on-screen characters just as publicists pick the social media platforms as a means for spreading fake news.

1.3       Aims of the Study

The study aims to:

  1. Find out the ideology behind the utilization of social media for the dispersal of fake news.
5
  • Examine the difficult faced when it comes to tracing these accounts online after the messages must have been sent.
  1. Find out how social media messages can be verified online and how to prevent such messages online.

1.4       Objectives of the Study

  1. Ascertain why advertisers and politicians choose the social media as a tool for propagating their fake news.
  2. Evaluate how effective the social media has been as a tool for propagating fake news.
  3. Identify the damages caused by the use of social media by the general public through social media platforms.
  4. Analyse the consequences of these effects since most of them are fatal.
  5. Evaluate is the implication of the continuous use of the social media amidst these threats that it holds.

 

  • Research Questions

 

  1. Why do advertisers and politicians choose the social media as a tool for propagating their fake news?
  2. How effective is the social media as a tool for propagating fake news?
  3. What are the damages caused by the use of social media by the general public through social media platforms?
  4. Are there consequences caused by these fake news contents on social media?
  5. What are the implications of the continuous use of the social media amidst these threats that it holds?

 

6

 

 

1.6       Significance of the Study

This study is critical in light of the fact that fake news via social media and its impact is tormenting the general public consistently. It is in this manner essential to build up an asset managed for buyers and other social media clients on the best way to utilize social media and abstain from being misled. It is accepted that with expanded comprehension and information guardians, teachers, and just as shoppers will have the option to more readily ensure themselves against damaging or digital tormenting.

The result of the investigation will in this manner empower guardians, instructors, and shoppers to have essential information on the best way to utilize these stages successfully. At the end, this study will guide guardians, teachers, and buyers an agenda of sorts to manage them through perceiving the hazard factors, understanding the predominance, and distinguishing steps to be taken once an understudy is thought to be in a circumstance or acting under fake news.

1.7       Scope of the Study

This study is centred around the misuse of the social media and its impact on the instructive objectives and accomplishments. The study will be constrained to covering social media sites such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram etc. The study looks at the processes involved in digesting social media contents. At last, the study would enlighten consumers as well as the populace towards the dangers of the social media.

1.8       Limitations of the Study

7

The work has been restricted in a number of ways. It’s anything but an exaggeration that a work of this nature can’t be completed without some hitches; anyway beneath are a limitations to this work. There are numerous restrictions extending from not realizing where to begin, not realizing who to counsel or approach for materials not recognizing what to write in different section of this study and not really realizing who to get me through in accomplishing my work and others are:

  1. Coronal virus pandemic limiting the use of the school’s library.
  2. Duration for the exploration work is moderately short
  3. Materials that are accessible on this subject are moderately little as the idea is some worth new or individuals have not composed much from that edge.

1.9       Conceptual Definition of Terms

Bias: a particular tendency, trend, inclination, feeling, opinion, especially one that is preconceived unreasoned; unreasonably hostile feelings or opinions about a social group.

Clickbait:  Internet content whose main purpose is to encourage users to follow a link to a web page, esp. where that web page is considered to be of low quality or value.

Confirmation Bias: The tendency to interpret information that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses

Content-Sharing: refers to the strategic distribution of webpage and blog content across relevant social media such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIN, and Google . It implies distribution with the intent of building engagement and referral traffic.

8

Disinformation: is false or misleading information that is spread deliberately to deceive. This is a subset of misinformation, which may also be unintentional.

Fake News:    Fake news’’ is information that has been deliberately fabricated and disseminated with the intention to deceive and mislead others into believing falsehoods or doubting verifiable facts.

Disinformation: false information, as about a country’s militarystrength or plans, publicly announced or planted in the news media, especially of other countries.

Fact: something known to exist or to have happened a truth known by actual experience orobservation; something known to be true

Fake News: Fake news websites (also referred to online as hoax news), deliberately publish hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. These sites are distinguished from news satire, as they mislead and profit from readers’ gullibility.

Hoax:  something intended to deceive or defraud

Misinformation: false or inaccurate information, especially that which is deliberately intended to deceives.

Post-truth: an adjective defined as ‘relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.

Propaganda: information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spreadwidely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.:  The deliberate spreading of such information, rumours, etc: To build support for an ideology or leader and demonizing the opposition.

9

Social Media: websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.

SOCIAL MEDIA AS A TOOL FOR PROPAGATING FAKE NEWS

Leave a Reply